13 07 12

Spotify helps Swedish music sales rise 30.1% in first half of 2012


Access our full reports archive - hundreds of reports available to download

Streaming music now accounts for 89% of digital music sales in Sweden, according to figures released by GLF, the local arm of music industry body the IFPI.

In fact, the entire music market in Sweden is buoyant. Overall music sales increased by 30.1% year-on-year in the first half of 2012 to SEK 446m (around $63.5m), with digital music accounting for 63.5% of all music sales.

So, while physical revenues fell by 2.2% in the first six months of 2012, digital revenues were up 60.5%. Streaming revenues rose 79.4% to SEK 252.7m ($40m), while ‘other’ digital revenues (i.e. downloads) fell 14% to SEK 30.7m ($4.4m).

Or, to put it a different way, streaming is cannibalising downloads in Sweden, but the growth of the former is far outweighing the fall of the latter. And, in fact, streaming growth is also more-than compensating for the ongoing slump in physical music sales.

The popularity of Spotify – while other streaming services are available in Sweden, it’s really Spotify we’re talking about – might be bad news for Apple’s iTunes, but it looks like good news for labels, publishers AND artists. With the caveat that this relies on artists getting their fair cuts of these streaming revenues through their labels – an ongoing debate.

“The Swedish music companies have been extremely quick to adapt their business models to today’s parallel sales channels. What’s more, Swedes have shown that they really like streaming music. Now, when buying music in a way that suits the consumer is easier than ever before, music sales increase,” says Ludvig Werner, MD of IFPI Sweden.

“The first half of 2012 has not only been characterized by a very strong period for streaming music, but even the sales of CDs have been strong, with a decrease of only 1%.”

Werner warns that this must be seen against a backdrop of severe slumps in previous years – “these half year figures are 40 percent lower than in the first half of 2000” – but the figures certainly make Sweden a poster market for streaming music.

The question now is whether this pattern, four years after Spotify launched in its home market, will be repeated elsewhere in the world. Spotify itself has jumped on the figures this morning, gathering quotes from label execs and one artist manager reacting to the IFPI stats.

“We’re back to the same revenue levels as during 2004, and if the development continues in the same way we’ll be back on turnover similar to those during the “golden days” of the CD in just a few years,” says Universal Music Sweden’s MD Per Sundin.

“We’ve seen massive change in music consumption, where music fans are now listening to more music than ever, in an entirely legal environment. This means that revenues are increasing all the time, and artists get paid every time their music is played. Our artists get significant revenues from Spotify, which is our biggest income source for Sweden. A positive side effect is that we’re investing a lot in new talent.”

Mark Dennis, CEO of Sony Music Sweden, makes the same point: “One of the most gratifying consequences of this is that it gives us the opportunity to sign more artists, and record more new Swedish music than ever. In fact, for most of our artists, streaming music now represents the majority of the revenue.”

Yes, Spotify would hardly be putting out quotes from people who aren’t so enthusiastic about its impact. Even in Sweden, there are still dissenting artists who complain about the payouts they get from their music being streamed.

Today’s figures may inject new fuel into that debate: the more money Spotify makes for the music industry, the more artists who feel they’re getting a raw deal may turn their attention to the contracts they signed with their labels, and ask some tough questions.

Stuart Dredge
READ MORE: Analysis News
5 responses
  • any research or opinions on what percentage of Swedish users are Spotify paid users versus free?

    If many Swedish users are paying for premium subs – what explains this? is it because of discounted deals via mobile and TV companies?

    it seems a stretch of the imagination that Sweden has suddenly discovered a new national willingness to pay more for music, so I suspect the cost of premium subscriptions must somehow be ‘hidden’ from consumers. correct?

  • steiz says:

    “it seems a stretch of the imagination that Sweden has suddenly discovered a new national willingness to pay more for music”

    It’s never been about willingness to pay for music. According to the article we still pay less then we did a decade ago – it’s all about availabillity imo. The price of spotify premium for one month is less then one album on CD cost. It really is a small sum to pay no matter how you look on it.

    To answer you question, i don’t know of any service that includes spotify other then a month or two included with a new mobile plan.

  • Charbax says:

    How much money goes to the artists directly?

    Why do artists need the labels?

    Of the $40 million paid the labels, only $2 million goes directly to the artists? How is that a good thing for music?

    We need a global licence model that collects money from all users of the web and distributes that money directly to the artists, without any intermediaries taking a share of content monetization, the intermediaries can monetize the services but they should not touch the money that is 100% supposed to go to the content creators.

  • no says:

    Can’t support spotify, because they require users to be also on spybook.
    That crosses the line

    Also, what’s weird about statements like this (89%) is that download buyers buy just once and listen on whatever device, place, environment, time they wish – without anyone coming and logging it for any purpose. Unless they scrobble to someplace, but that won’t count into these stats anyway.
    So how could statistics like this be correct?

  • Emilio says:

    It takes just a minute to realize if are free or paid users, here in Gothenburg for example all the ppl i know (from 20 to 35 years) have an spottily subscription and 100% have it cuz you can listen in your mobile. When u look at the ppl who listen music in the street, all of them are using spotify, believe or not. It is not an statistic is just a perception. I also pay the subscription cuz of the mobile feature.

Leave a Reply

(All fields required)