<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eMusic stands up for the long tail of digital music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musically.com/blog/2009/01/15/emusic-stands-up-for-the-long-tail-of-digital-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/01/15/emusic-stands-up-for-the-long-tail-of-digital-music/</link>
	<description>The Music Ally Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why did Jaman fail? &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/01/15/emusic-stands-up-for-the-long-tail-of-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-25206</link>
		<dc:creator>Why did Jaman fail? &#171; Gordon Mattey&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=581#comment-25206</guid>
		<description>[...] eMusic, they recently stated that all the community services and tools are great, but &#8221;we reinforce the music discovery experience with subscription pricing that encourages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eMusic, they recently stated that all the community services and tools are great, but &#8221;we reinforce the music discovery experience with subscription pricing that encourages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Label:Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shared Items - January 16, 2009</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/01/15/emusic-stands-up-for-the-long-tail-of-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-17545</link>
		<dc:creator>Label:Life &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shared Items - January 16, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=581#comment-17545</guid>
		<description>[...] eMusic stands up for the long tail of digital music January 15, 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eMusic stands up for the long tail of digital music January 15, 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/01/15/emusic-stands-up-for-the-long-tail-of-digital-music/comment-page-1/#comment-17386</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=581#comment-17386</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you can qualify eMusic&#039;s subscription model as a long tail business.  It is misleading to say that they 75% of it&#039;s tracks &quot;sold&quot;, since the store is like a pay-one-price all you can eat buffet. In many of the long tail examples, the product was priced uniformly across the tail which is actually more like the MCPS-PRS/mBox store. This seems to be a case against the long tail, but I am skeptical of the results.

If eMusic was varying their pricing dynamically with demand to maintain the low opportunity cost for consumers to experience new and/or obscure music, they would be doing more to leverage the long tail (someone please correct me if this is wrong). I commend eMusic&#039;s web 2.0 features that create &quot;filters&quot; (a main component of long tail businesses) with editorial content and some sort of community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you can qualify eMusic&#8217;s subscription model as a long tail business.  It is misleading to say that they 75% of it&#8217;s tracks &#8220;sold&#8221;, since the store is like a pay-one-price all you can eat buffet. In many of the long tail examples, the product was priced uniformly across the tail which is actually more like the MCPS-PRS/mBox store. This seems to be a case against the long tail, but I am skeptical of the results.</p>
<p>If eMusic was varying their pricing dynamically with demand to maintain the low opportunity cost for consumers to experience new and/or obscure music, they would be doing more to leverage the long tail (someone please correct me if this is wrong). I commend eMusic&#8217;s web 2.0 features that create &#8220;filters&#8221; (a main component of long tail businesses) with editorial content and some sort of community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
