<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Britain: UK Music proposes five measures for persistent file-sharers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/</link>
	<description>The Music Ally Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AMB Album &#187; Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-28358</link>
		<dc:creator>AMB Album &#187; Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-28358</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dance Platform</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dance Platform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26599</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for sharing the precious information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for sharing the precious information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing &#124; AllStuff!!!</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26314</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing &#124; AllStuff!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26314</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26299</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26299</guid>
		<description>Make no mistake, &#039;UK music companies have exceeded themselves&#039; DESPITE the music industry. The industry has consistently put barriers in front of online music companies. Unrealistic royalty rates anyone?  

I find it funny that UK Music can now come up with  a statement like this bearing in mind their thoughts with regard to YouTube and other online music delivery companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make no mistake, &#8216;UK music companies have exceeded themselves&#8217; DESPITE the music industry. The industry has consistently put barriers in front of online music companies. Unrealistic royalty rates anyone?  </p>
<p>I find it funny that UK Music can now come up with  a statement like this bearing in mind their thoughts with regard to YouTube and other online music delivery companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjjo</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26294</link>
		<dc:creator>pjjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26294</guid>
		<description>I agree with Anon!! Dead right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Anon!! Dead right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26285</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26285</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I find this entire article, and the whole Digital Britain piece abhorant. 

&quot;UK music companies have exceeded themselves in terms of innovation and experimentation, offering unprecedented access and choice to music fans&quot; WHAT?! WHEN!? The only fair part of this statement is that they have &#039;exceeded themselves&#039;, which is obviously true given that they have stagnated the marketplace for decades. 

The five proposals are laughable, and the reason for their existance, terrifying. The proposals themselves sound far more like good conduct rules on a forum or online game. The reason for their existance is what really troubles me though:

Not mentioned here is that in the Digital Britain article, the government outlines its plan to reduce file sharing by 70% (arbitrary number much??) in 1 year. How? By telling the ISPs to do it for them. What happens if they don&#039;t? Well, if they can&#039;t reduce it by 70% in 12 months, the government is giving themselves the power to up the anti. How?

Filtering.

As far as I&#039;m aware, there are no illegal file sharing websites. It&#039;s incredulous to suggest that banning sites such as bittorrent and thepiratebay is a justified step in the fight against copyright infringement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I find this entire article, and the whole Digital Britain piece abhorant. </p>
<p>&#8220;UK music companies have exceeded themselves in terms of innovation and experimentation, offering unprecedented access and choice to music fans&#8221; WHAT?! WHEN!? The only fair part of this statement is that they have &#8216;exceeded themselves&#8217;, which is obviously true given that they have stagnated the marketplace for decades. </p>
<p>The five proposals are laughable, and the reason for their existance, terrifying. The proposals themselves sound far more like good conduct rules on a forum or online game. The reason for their existance is what really troubles me though:</p>
<p>Not mentioned here is that in the Digital Britain article, the government outlines its plan to reduce file sharing by 70% (arbitrary number much??) in 1 year. How? By telling the ISPs to do it for them. What happens if they don&#8217;t? Well, if they can&#8217;t reduce it by 70% in 12 months, the government is giving themselves the power to up the anti. How?</p>
<p>Filtering.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m aware, there are no illegal file sharing websites. It&#8217;s incredulous to suggest that banning sites such as bittorrent and thepiratebay is a justified step in the fight against copyright infringement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing - ComponentGear.com Feed - ComponentGear.com</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26279</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing - ComponentGear.com Feed - ComponentGear.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26279</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i-penny</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26275</link>
		<dc:creator>i-penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26275</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing &#124; yKvz Blog</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26273</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Britain Report Promises Universal Broadband Access, Requires ISPs to Cut Down on File Sharing &#124; yKvz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26273</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Ally blog features a more detailed breakdown of the proposed anti-piracy measures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://musically.com/blog/2009/06/16/digital-britain-uk-music-proposes-five-measures-for-persistent-file-sharers/comment-page-1/#comment-26271</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musically.com/blog/?p=1691#comment-26271</guid>
		<description>As the French case demonstrates, if the Government wants to argue that internet access is effectively a universal right, and a fundamental utility, then chopping someone&#039;s service for file-sharing is a basic breach of human rights ... 

No-one thinks letters will be effective, but it&#039;s rapidly getting to the stage when we should be asking why anyone would bother downloading illegally. I can get pretty much what I want, when I want, on Spotify or all sorts of other services. 

Of course, we haven&#039;t been telling the industry this for more than five years. Bah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the French case demonstrates, if the Government wants to argue that internet access is effectively a universal right, and a fundamental utility, then chopping someone&#8217;s service for file-sharing is a basic breach of human rights &#8230; </p>
<p>No-one thinks letters will be effective, but it&#8217;s rapidly getting to the stage when we should be asking why anyone would bother downloading illegally. I can get pretty much what I want, when I want, on Spotify or all sorts of other services. </p>
<p>Of course, we haven&#8217;t been telling the industry this for more than five years. Bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
