Consider battle properly joined between Gracenote and The Echo Nest, with the former finally opening up its music APIs and SDKs fully to developers on Friday.
We say ‘fully’ because Gracenote’s MusicID audio fingerprinting tech has already been used by the likes of Sony, Soundtracking, MusiXmatch and Rhapsody in their apps. Now it’ll be usable by smaller developers and startups too, whether they’re making mobile or desktop apps, or websites.
“Innovation comes from anywhere, not just from big, well-funded companies,” said president Stephen White in a statement.
“There is no other open development platform for music available today that has the depth and scale that Gracenote supports. We want to discover the next great music developers by giving them a chance to dive deep into this data and technology, play around with it, and see what they can create.”
Gracenote is pitching the initiative as a way to “acknowledge our roots” – its database was freely accessible to developers in the company’s earlier days.
It’s just as much an acknowledgement of stiff competition from The Echo Nest, whose APIs have been used for more than 350 apps (not to mention Spotify, Nokia, Vevo and Clear Channel), and which raised $17.3m of funding in 2012 before poaching two of Gracenote’s senior executives.
Intensifying competition between the two companies should be good for developers, and for music/tech innovation.
Finally, more progress towards an #opensource #musicindustry. Forward thinking, like the kind demonstrated here by Gracenote, is what will push the industry towards a more open, more collaborative music ecosystem. When artists & developers realize that the true value is in the data–about users tastes, preferences, and their listening profiles–we’ll see even more innovation from the development community, which will ultimately lead to better products and choices for the fans–the end users, who will have more access to the music they love. Bravo, Gracenote. One small step towards the #free #music #revolution!
Is this the same Gracenote that released their database with an open source license for people to contribute to then claimed it was a mistake and is actually proprietary?